Friday 24 April 2020

Exit Strategy: Take the Money and Run

     The oil industry has been a big deal here in Alberta for decades; our two NHL teams are the Oilers and the Flames, and while the latter started out as the Atlanta Flames (named for the burning of Atlanta during the Civil War), they kept the nickname when they moved to Calgary because it was evocative of the flare stacks you see at oil refineries. And our provincial government has long been increasingly friendly to oil interests, to the point where it's fair to say they govern for their exclusive benefit.
     For example, for many years the provincial Conservative Party had set the royalty rates on oil and gas at below the market value recommended by independent economists. They also were very lax about enforcing rules on setting aside money to clean up abandoned oil wells, so it's been a common practice for wells to be operated by small throwaway corporations who conveniently go bankrupt before having to properly rehabilitate spent well sites. Alberta has thousands of orphan wells, with an estimated cleanup cost in the tens of billions, according to this CBC story.

    The corruption and entitlement of the Conservative Dynasty reached a peak in 2015, when there was just enough anger among the electorate (and division among conservative factions) to allow the New Democratic Party to form a government. They had a steep learning curve, but they were doing a pretty good job starting to repair the damage. But the old Progressive Conservative party and the Wild Rose Party merged to form the United Conservative Party and, with a very well-funded campaign vilifying the NDP, managed to retake a majority in the provincial legislature.

    I had thought, at the time, that their long term game plan would stay the same: pander to the oil companies for as long as they can, and if worse comes to worst and their opponents get elected, blame all of the long-term damage from their own policies on the four years of their opponents trying to fix that damage, and get re-elected to continue oil service.
    But lately that has shifted in a very sinister way. The very first thing the UCP did when they won the provincial election last year was announce a major business tax cut, ostensibly to help create jobs.  (It did not have that effect. Husky Oil, one of the bigger beneficiaries of the reduced taxes, announced layoffs shortly afterwards.) And the UCP has been making truly devastating cuts to education and health care (yes, even health care, in the middle of a pandemic). And just last week, a government pension fund lost $4 billion on an unusually risky investment.

    I don't think this is business as usual. I think what's happening is that the oil companies are recognizing that oil isn't coming back. Investment in and demand for sustainable alternative sources of energy continues to grow, while fossil fuels are becoming at the very least unfashionable. And the pandemic is, among other things, getting people talking about how blue the skies are and how maybe we don't need to fly or drive everywhere quite so much. This will pass, and -$35 a barrel oil futures are almost certainly an anomaly, but the future just doesn't look all that rosy for the oil industry, and they know it.
     So what would you do, if you realized that your long term prospects for extracting wealth from the ground were effectively at an end? The sensible-self-interested strategy would be to liquidate all the assets you could from your oil-production business and get the hell out. Abandon your spent wells and leave someone else to pay for cleaning them up, but on a much bigger scale.

     How big a scale? How about a whole province? For decades, it was worthwhile to keep Alberta functioning as an advanced oil-extraction support system. They needed smart engineers and geologists and technicians, and so it was worth it to spend money on education, and on a robust health care system to support the work force. But now, with the future of oil in doubt, investing in all these other things doesn't really benefit the oil interests. That's why the UCP is making such drastic cuts to everything, while dumping as much money into "supporting" the oil industry as possible. But those subsidies aren't going to attract new investment in developing Alberta's oil resources. It's part of the process of draining as much value out of the asset as possible while they still can, that asset being the provincial government itself. It's time for them to take the money and run.

     It's not that Premier Jason Kenny and his cabinet are unaware that their policies will leave Alberta in a desperate mess when their term is over and they face another election. It's that they don't care. They may still have enough financial backing from the oil industry to hang on for another election, but even if they don't, they know they're in the endgame already. If they lose the next election, then the mess they've made will be someone else's problem. That was the plan all along.

8 comments:

  1. I really wish that you were wrong sometimes...

    ReplyDelete
  2. UCP admitting it didn't work, but pushing ahead: https://calgaryherald.com/opinion/columnists/varcoe-energy-minister-explains-why-corporate-tax-cut-has-not-yet-boosted-oilpatch-jobs/

    ReplyDelete
  3. During the election, we have economists like Trevor Tombes telling us that the UCP's proposed fiscal consolidation policies don't work. They hinder economic recovery and increase wealth disparity. Essentially, corporations use tax breaks for share buybacks and dividends rather than creating jobs, which takes that money out of the local economy instead of paying it out in wages which are spent within the local economy. This is a relatively recent realization stemming from the 2008 recession, and it's the reason you don't hear about austerity much any more. We'd be better off hiring people to dig a hole one day and fill it in the next than giving it out of large corporations; at least the money would stay in our economy.

    These cuts are far deeper than they need to be to pay for lower corporate taxes; we lost $440 million in revenue from the first year's 1% tax cut, and they're going to keep lowering it by 1% per year so we're going to lose a more in the future. The suffering of working class Albertans that stem from these unnecessary cuts has no economic benefit to rationalize it. The rhetoric of "we have to do this to save the economy" demonstrates either utter incompetence or an outright lie.

    This isn't all theorycraft; our economic dashboard demonstrates it. Or at least it did; it now appears that the metric the UCP don't like are no longer being displayed. Unemployment went from trending downwards to going up again. Employment did the opposite. New home purchases dropped. Vehicle purchases dropped. Our GDP is going up, but that isn't benefiting working class Albertans because, as you've said, corporations are taking the money and running with it. Those stats all changed for the worse before the trade war between OPEC and Russia, and before CV19 hit. I shudder to think at what these policies are going to do when we try to recover from the recession those two events have triggered.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Just found this blog. Drop of sunshine, you are. And totally correct in your assumptions. Same is going in USA as the 1% realize at some point their days are numbered come the revolution.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Great analysis! I have been thinking much the same thing for some time now.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I moved to Alberta in 1976. At that time a story was going on of multimillion dollar bailout over loan guarantees - and cutting benefits for the destitute. Taxing the poor has never seemed smart. They are not the ones with money to pay.
    But. Fossil fuels are not obsolete. It is a dream to think part time erratic generation can substitute for on demand power on the grid. If 'green' generation is cheaper - maybe it's becoming harder to snow people into paying for it. Rather what happens is that blackouts proliferate while industry flees.
    Germany really did a number on costs by backstopping wind and solar power with fuel. That meant every system was duplicated - and fluctuating production is not achieved without excess wear.
    Fossil fuel extraction does leave a mess - and uranium mining is bad on groundwater. But. Look into disposal of wind generators. What an impossible 'solution' to pollution.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are fossil fuels not obsolete? Not yet, no, but they appear to be at least obselescent. My argument here is not that we're going to stop using oil cold turkey in the next year or so, but rather that the oil and gas industry is not expecting to expand or even maintain their operations in Alberta. Russian and Saudi Arabia can still produce it more cheaply than we can, and are more than willing to do so in quantities that meet global demand while driving North American producers out of business.

      That won't continue forever, of course, but what will happen in the meantime, and after? MAYBE oil will come back to Alberta, but I don't think they expect to do so for a generation or more. And that's why I think they are slashing education and health care so ruthlessly.

      Delete